Performance Management: How to give constructive criticism – using A>R>C
When we are giving constructive criticism, we are seeking to motivate the employee to make a change – a change that leads to improved performance. Here’s a useful model for explaining the need and gaining agreement to making that change;
ACTION & RESULTS & CONSEQUENCES = AGREEMENT
Action
Is about explaining in clear, objective, non judgemental language what the employee is doing – the actions they are taking or not taking – that’s causing a problem. The focus is on behaviors
When you do this…
Results
Is about defining and explaining the results of those actions
This is what happens…
Consequences
Is about defining and explaining the negative consequence of the actions
And this is why it is a problem…
Why results and consequences persuade
Most employees generally don’t want to be the cause of negative consequences. They don’t want to cause problems for the business, the team, for you or (of course) for themselves.
What managers need to do therefore is help the employee understand what happens as a result of their actions, or lack of action, and why that has a negative consequence.
An example
Let’s take a simple example of an employee who arrives late to team meetings
ACTION – You arrived 20 minutes late to yesterday’s team meeting
RESULT – We needed to stop the meeting to update you on what we had discussed so far
CONSEQUENCE – This was a waste of time for other team members, so not an efficient way to work
What type of consequence?
You’ll notice that in the above example I have used a consequence related to the business. I have a (very) strong preference for ’business consequences’ because they are a) easy to describe b) factual and c) therefore ‘depersonalised’
I could have described the consequence to;
- the team e.g. they were unhappy at having to spend time updating you
- you (the manager) e.g. I found it difficult to get the meeting back on track
- to the employee themselves e.g. it makes you look unprofessional
In short, your choice of consequence (and I’d suggest you only use one) is based on your knowledge of the employee. Will they be more motivated to change by understanding the consequence to the business? Or are they more interested in how they are perceived? Would they be motivated to change by understanding the consequence to you?
My advice – if in doubt, stick to the business!
Would you like to know more about how to effectively manage your employees? Would you also like to read about the 5 classic mistakes that could be getting in the way of ‘effective management’ (and what to do about them!)?
Then claim your copy of my special report ‘Boost your business performance through effective people management’ at http://www.boostemployeeperformance.com
Filed under Giving Constructive Criticism, Performance Management by on May 16th, 2011. Comment.



Pingback: Giving ‘Artful Performance Feedback’ | Managing Employee Performance
Pingback: Generation Y and Performance Reviews | Managing Employee Performance
Pingback: Management Tips: 10 Quick Tips for Giving Constructive Criticism | Managing Employee Performance
Pingback: A-Z of Management Skills: F is for ‘Feedback’ | Managing Employee Performance
Pingback: Employee Performance: 3 Reasons Why Employees Under Perform | Managing Employee Performance